Health

BMI, calorie & wellness calculators

20 tools
Health · United States

Cholesterol Ratio Calculator

TC/HDL, LDL/HDL, TG/HDL and non-HDL with risk bands, the TG/HDL insulin-resistance flag and Friedewald LDL — risk markers, not a diagnosis. Accurate, instant and free — for United States.

Units

What these mean:

mg/dL
mg/dL
mg/dL
mg/dL
Cholesterol ratios
4.0TC/HDL ratio
TC/HDL
4.0
LDL/HDL
2.6
TG/HDL
3.0
Non-HDL (mg/dL)
150

TC/HDL 4, LDL/HDL 2.6, TG/HDL 3, non-HDL 150 mg/dL. Friedewald LDL ≈ 120 mg/dL. Risk markers, not a diagnosis — see a clinician.

Rates as of 2026

TC/HDL

4

good

LDL/HDL

2.6

good

TG/HDL

3

≥ 1.5 (IR flag)

Non-HDL

150 mg/dL

above 130 goal

TG/HDL 3 ≥ 1.5 — insulin-resistance flag

A TG/HDL ratio at or above 1.5 is an established proxy for insulin resistance and is often one of the better metabolic risk markers. The 1.5 cutoff is for mg/dL units — it does not apply directly to mmol/L. If insulin resistance is a concern, an A1C Calculator gives a complementary glycemic view.

Friedewald LDL

Friedewald LDL ≈ 120 mg/dL.

Friedewald = TC − HDL − (TG ÷ 5), in mg/dL; invalid when triglycerides exceed 400 mg/dL (measure LDL directly). Non-HDL (TC − HDL) is a treatment goal — generally < 130 mg/dL, < 100 at high risk, < 85 at very-high risk.

Risk markers, not a diagnosis

Cholesterol ratios and non-HDL are cardiovascular risk markers, not a diagnosis. Lower ratios are generally better, but treatment decisions depend on your full picture — see a clinician. Reference bands as of 2026.

How we calculate this

Reviewed by Reckonist Editorial · Last reviewed July 2026. Figures follow the methods and sources set out in our editorial standards.

Ratios and non-HDL are cardiovascular risk markers, not a diagnosis. Bands per Mayo/NLA/ACC-AHA (2026). General health information, not medical advice — see a clinician.

Mayo Clinic · NLA / ACC-AHA lipid guidance · Friedewald LDL · reference data as of 2026

Tracking metabolic and kidney health too? See the A1C Calculator and the eGFR Calculator.

Methodology

The four ratios and their risk bands

From one lipid panel — total cholesterol, HDL, LDL and triglycerides — this tool computes TC/HDL, LDL/HDL, TG/HDL and non-HDL, and classifies each into a risk band. Most calculators show only TC/HDL; the full panel — including the TG/HDL insulin-resistance marker and non-HDL as a treatment goal — is the point.

TC/HDL & LDL/HDL

atherogenic ratios

TC/HDL = total ÷ HDL ; LDL/HDL = LDL ÷ HDL

TC/HDL: ideal < 3.5, good < 5, borderline 56, high > 6. LDL/HDL ideal < 2. Lower is better.

TG/HDL & non-HDL

metabolic + treatment goal

TG/HDL = trig ÷ HDL ; non-HDL = total − HDL

TG/HDL ≥ 1.5 (mg/dL) flags insulin resistance. Non-HDL goal < 130 mg/dL (< 100 high-risk, < 85 very-high-risk).

Worked example · TC 200 / HDL 50 / LDL 130 / TG 150 mg/dL
TC/HDL
4.0
LDL/HDL
2.6
TG/HDL
3.0
non-HDL
150 mg/dL
  1. 1
    Ratios: 200 ÷ 50 = 4.0 (TC/HDL); 130 ÷ 50 = 2.6 (LDL/HDL); 150 ÷ 50 = 3.0 (TG/HDL — ≥ 1.5, an insulin-resistance flag).
  2. 2
    non-HDL + Friedewald LDL: non-HDL = 200 − 50 = 150 mg/dL(above the < 130 goal). Friedewald LDL = 200 − 50 − (150 ÷ 5) = 120 mg/dL — close to the measured 130; the small gap is exactly why Martin-Hopkins is more accurate.
The marker most calculators skip

TG/HDL — an insulin-resistance proxy

The triglyceride-to-HDL ratio is more than a lipid number: in mg/dL, a TG/HDL at or above 1.5 is a widely-cited proxy for insulin resistance, and it is often one of the better predictors of cardiovascular risk. It is the angle single-ratio calculators leave out.

The unit trap — 1.5 is a mg/dL figure

The 1.5 insulin-resistance cutoff is defined for mg/dL units. It does not apply directly to mmol/L, because cholesterol and triglycerides convert with different factors (38.67 vs 88.57). This tool converts every mmol/L value to mg/dL before checking the cutoff.

Pair it with a glycemic marker

A raised TG/HDL is a metabolic signal, not a diagnosis. To see the glycemic side of the picture, use the A1C Calculator — together they sketch the metabolic-syndrome landscape, but confirm anything with a clinician.
Treatment goal + derived LDL

Non-HDL as a goal, and how LDL is derived

Non-HDL cholesterol (total − HDL) captures every atherogenic particle, not just LDL, so guidelines increasingly treat it as the better target: generally below 130 mg/dL, below 100 at high risk, below 85 at very-high risk. Because it needs only total cholesterol and HDL, it is computable even when LDL is missing. LDL itself is usually derived, via Friedewald: LDL = total − HDL − (triglycerides ÷ 5) — which is invalid above 400 mg/dL of triglycerides, where LDL must be measured directly.

Reference

mg/dL vs mmol/L — two different factors

Cholesterol (total, LDL, HDL) converts with a factor of 38.67 (divide mg/dL by 38.67 for mmol/L). Triglycerides use 88.57, because the molecule is heavier. Applying one factor to a whole panel is a classic error — and it is why the TG/HDL 1.5 cutoff (a mg/dL figure) does not transfer unchanged to mmol/L. This tool labels every value with its unit and converts each with the correct factor.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

The total-cholesterol-to-HDL (TC/HDL) ratio is the one most often quoted: below about 3.5 is ideal, under 5 is good, 5–6 is borderline, and above 6 is high. LDL/HDL is ideal below 2. These come from dividing your total or LDL cholesterol by your HDL, so raising HDL or lowering LDL both improve the ratio. Lower is better — and a ratio is a risk marker, not a diagnosis.

The triglyceride-to-HDL (TG/HDL) ratio is an underappreciated metabolic marker: in mg/dL units, a ratio at or above 1.5 is a commonly cited proxy for insulin resistance, and it is often one of the better predictors of cardiovascular risk. Important caveat: the 1.5 cutoff is defined for mg/dL. If your lab reports mmol/L, the number is different — convert before comparing. For a complementary glycemic view, pair it with an A1C.

Non-HDL cholesterol is simply total cholesterol minus HDL — it captures every atherogenic ("bad") particle, not just LDL, so many guidelines treat it as a better target than LDL alone. It is framed as a treatment goal: generally below 130 mg/dL, below 100 mg/dL if you are at high risk, and below 85 mg/dL at very-high risk (per NLA / ACC-AHA). It needs only total cholesterol and HDL, so you can compute it even when LDL is missing.

Most labs derive LDL rather than measure it directly, using Friedewald: LDL = total cholesterol − HDL − (triglycerides ÷ 5), in mg/dL. It becomes unreliable when triglycerides exceed 400 mg/dL, in which case LDL should be measured directly. The Martin-Hopkins method swaps the fixed ÷5 for an adjustable factor and is more accurate at low LDL or high triglycerides — which is why a derived LDL can differ slightly from a measured one.

Cholesterol (total, LDL, HDL) converts with a factor of 38.67 — divide mg/dL by 38.67 for mmol/L. Triglycerides use a different factor, 88.57, because their molecule is heavier. That difference is why you cannot apply one conversion to a whole panel, and why the TG/HDL 1.5 insulin-resistance cutoff (a mg/dL figure) does not carry over unchanged to mmol/L. This calculator converts each value with the correct factor before computing anything.

Yes — it is completely free with no sign-up, and every calculation runs entirely in your browser. Nothing you enter is sent to a server or stored. It is general health information for education, not medical advice, and the ratios it shows are cardiovascular risk markers, not a diagnosis.

Sources

Method, standards & references

Methodology: TC/HDL = total ÷ HDL; LDL/HDL = LDL ÷ HDL; TG/HDL = triglycerides ÷ HDL (a mg/dL insulin-resistance proxy at ≥ 1.5); non-HDL = total − HDL, a treatment goal (< 130 general, < 100 high-risk, < 85 very-high-risk). Friedewald LDL = total − HDL − (triglycerides ÷ 5), invalid above 400 mg/dL. Units: cholesterol ÷ 38.67, triglycerides ÷ 88.57. Bands held in versioned config per Mayo / NLA / ACC-AHA; all calculations run client-side and nothing is stored. Reference data as of 2026. Risk markers, not a diagnosis.

Cross-links

Completing the lab-panel picture? Use the A1C Calculator for glycemic control and the eGFR Calculator for kidney function.

How we calculate this

Reviewed by Reckonist Editorial · Last reviewed July 2026. Figures follow the methods and sources set out in our editorial standards.

These ratios and non-HDL are cardiovascular risk markers computed with standard formulas and bands per Mayo / NLA / ACC-AHA (2026). Lower ratios are generally better, but this is general health information for education, not medical advice, and not a diagnosis. Treatment decisions depend on your full clinical picture — always confirm with a clinician.

Keep going

Same-category tools follow this colour; a cross-category link keeps its own.